For some reason the autumn season (however screwy it may be in Florida) makes me want to curl up indoors with a good book. I’ve fallen back in love with my local library after seeing the new additions and upgrades they’ve done in the years since I’d last been. Yeah, I know, libraries are great resources – I just got caught up in whatever excuse and had forgotten. Now, I’m back!
In order to educate myself a little further, I’ve been reading up on topics that interest me: science, reason, logic, evolution, geology, atheism, as well as commentary/criticisms on these topics. I was browsing the atheism/skeptic area of the library and noticed that it paled in comparison to the massive rows of religious material. It makes sense, though, since I feel my views pale in comparison to that of most people around me. This severe distinction just fuels me to learn more and educate myself on everything possible. So that maybe, just maybe, I can help someone off of the fence and onto the greener pastures of reason.
Anyway, in the midst of this tiny section I found a book titled, I Don’t Believe in Atheists by Chris Hedges. Well, surely this is meant to be a “witty” title because clearly atheists DO exist and you can prove them in existence scientifically. -5 points. I flipped through the pages – all 203 of them… noticing that the text is quite large for the size of the book (about the same as an outstretched hand) and thought to myself that this might not be SO painful to read. Then I began to read the inside cover….
From the New York Times bestselling author of American Fascists and the NBCC finalist for War Is a Force That Gives Us Meaning… about new atheists: those who attack religion to advance the worst of global capitalism, intolerance and imperial projects.
Seriously? Well, first off, I had to chuckle AND shake my head both at the same time over the title of the second book listed. War gives us meaning? Yeah… maybe the meaning that it’s usually and completely unnecessary. Follow that with atheists attacking religion? Okay, I’ll give that one to you. Many atheists would attack religion as a whole, but so do many people who are actually religious. They end up attacking a particular religion or two or ten. We just lump them all into one big, bad wolf. However, not ALL atheists attack religion. -5 points. I can already smell the correlation = causation misinterpretation oozing out of this book’s pages. Atheists advance the worst of global capitalism? Actually, when you break down what nations are the most successful versus the least – the most secular seem to be the winners here. -10 points. I’m not even sure what he means by “imperial projects” but I assume it’s something scary that I’ll find out once I delve into the book… but as far as intolerance goes, this is the big loser. -50 points. Nearly every single atheist I know (which isn’t every, but it is a significant amount) is VERY tolerant. Why? Because we know exactly what it’s like to deal with people who oppress you for believing something different even though it does NO harm to them at all. I’m actually pretty disgusted that Hedges would even label atheists as intolerant in the face of everything religion does to hold down those who don’t agree – hell, they even do it to people that do agree! I’m sorry, but stereotypes might be true in many cases, but they are usually not. I’m not even into page one, yet, and I already can see that this will be filled with the not.
The agenda of the new atheists, however, is disturbing. These atheists embrace a belief system as intolerant, chauvinistic and bigoted as that of religious fundamentalists (1).
-10 points. Atheists, as a collective, have absolutely NO shared belief system. Atheism is no more than a lack of belief in a deity – or even the conclusion that there is not any sufficient evidence to believe in one. That’s it. Sure, chances are that many of us will have the same values and morals when it comes to basic human interaction, but many of us differ in belief moreso than we will ever agree. So, to continue down the path of our beliefs being intolerant, chauvinistic, and bigoted is pointless…. and it’s absolutely untrue.
Ironically enough, just by flipping the page, I come across a passage that seems to contradict what I just quoted previously. Shocking, right?
(Sam) Harris, as well as atheists from (Christopher) Hitchens to Richard Dawkins to Daniel Dennett, has found a following among people disgusted with the chauvinism, intolerance, anti-intellectualism and self-righteousness of religious fundamentalists. I share this disgust (3).
Wait a fricken minute… So, first we all share collective beliefs that ARE chauvinistic, intolerant, etc. and now you’re suggesting that people who happen to like these men share a disgust for those exact “values?” And you agree? Huh? -5.
(Christianity) may not support the violent projects of apocalyptic killing championed by atheists such as Harris or Hitchens – or by some Christian radicals – but it also does not understand how the world works or the seduction of evil (4.)
Are you kidding me?! I am 100% positive that neither of those prominent atheists would even consider advocating some ‘apocalyptic’ killing of any sort. They adamantly oppose the killing of people – why else do you think they’re so polar to religion of any kind? -10. Shame on you for even insinuating such a disgusting falsehood to scare people off the fence and back onto your side.
Much of the first few pages contain little gems like I’ve already commented on, but they also contain a little about Hedges’ personal life and upbringing. He condemns fundamentalists, as any rational person should, but suggests that there is a gentle and kind middle ground in liberal Christianity. He claims that since there is nothing historical to provide adequate proof of moral progression, that it only makes sense to follow his liberal church. Of course, he’s forgetting slavery and women’s suffrage just to name a couple of many in recent history. I’m quite certain he was alive during the civil rights movement, or should know exactly what it was… so he’s denying that giving blacks the rights that whites had wasn’t a moral advance? Well, then why was it necessary to do it?
Hedges also suggests that atheists are pro-war (oddly enough I’ve never met even one) and that we divide the world into “superior and inferior” races of people. HA! Okay, well I will admit to segregating people in my own mind, but it has nothing to do with race. I think race is a ridiculous word to use for a species that is exactly the same but for a few gene differences. We are just barely different, genetically, from an actual primate… it’s just stupid to split people into races that make no difference and serve only a purpose for keeping us all divided. Anyway, yes, I do separate people. However, it is not by anything they cannot control, like color of skin, sexual orientation, gender, etc… it is by those things that a human can control. You can accept or reject what you hear, read, see, feel… how you accept and reject those ideas separates you from the other. If you walk around like a sheep your entire life, grazing and not questioning the herder – I would hold you in lesser regard than someone who actually thinks. BUT, most importantly, just because you do that doesn’t mean I don’t think you should have the same rights as everyone else. I am willing to bet that most atheists, even these so-called “leaders,” would agree.
to be continued…
-TGC
Filed under: atheism, Book, opinion, Religion, skepticism | Tagged: atheism, book review, Religion, skepticism | Leave a Comment »










